The Hardest Conversation: Charity Service Closure

What if the hardest conversation in a charity is also the most strategic?

Deciding to close a service is a moment of profound responsibility. It can feel like a failure, sparking fears of letting down users, staff, and funders. However, avoiding the decision is a far greater risk.

Responsible closure is not an admission of defeat; it is an act of strategic courage. It’s how you ensure every pound and every hour is focused on delivering the greatest possible impact. In my Service Lifecycle Management model, the ‘Retire’ phase is a planned and vital act of stewardship.

This guide provides a framework to help turn a conversation you might be dreading into a constructive way forward.

Phase 1: Preparation before the meeting

1. Recognise the triggers: How to decide when to review the sustainability of a charity service?

Impact is slipping: Key outcomes or equity measures are in decline.

The context has shifted: User demand, local needs, or the strategic landscape has changed.

Sustainability is at risk: Funding is precarious or the full cost of delivery is unsustainable.

It’s part of a routine: You’re conducting a regular portfolio review to ensure all services remain aligned and effective.

2. Decision criteria for winding down a charity service

Strategic Fit: How well does this service align with our core mission and long-term strategy?

Impact & Outcomes: What is the evidence that the service is effective? Is the trend of its key outcomes improving, stable, or declining?

Equity & Reach: Who are we reaching effectively and who is being missed by the current model?

Lived Experience: What are service users (past and present) telling us about its value and their experience?

Sustainability: Can we afford to continue to run this service safely and effectively?

Organisational Health: What is the impact of this service on our staff and volunteers? What are the risks of continuing, changing, or closing it?

3. Prepare the evidence snapshot

Reach: Who are you serving, and in what numbers?

Key Outcome Measures: Are you making the difference you intended? Show the trend over time (e.g., last 3 years).

Cost: What is the cost to deliver, including management and overheads? Is it financially sustainable?

Equity Signals: Who is being missed by the current model? Use demographic data or feedback to highlight gaps.

Operational Safety: Can we continue to meet required safety and safeguarding ratios with current resources?

Lived-Experience Feedback: Powerful quotes or key themes from service users about what is (and isn’t) working.

4. Assemble the right people

This isn't a conversation for just the finance team or the service delivery team in isolation. Ensure the meeting includes a representative who can speak to end-user feedback and needs (e.g. a Service Manager), a senior leader with budget authority, and a trustee if appropriate. Diverse perspectives lead to better, more robust decisions.

Phase 2: A guide to help you have a constructive conversation

Goal: To move from worry to a clear, evidence-based decision: should this service grow, pivot/redesign, remain steady, or retire?

I’ve pulled together a one-page PDF canvas you can use to help structure your meeting.

Download the Free Canvas

Next steps:

Service closure doesn't happen in a vacuum. It's a key part of a healthy service lifecycle. See the bigger picture with our guide to Strategic 'Retire & Renew': A Charity Service Portfolio Review.

Equip your team to manage the whole process with our full Service Lifecycle Management for Charities Guide.

By treating the end of a service with the same strategic rigour as its beginning, you build a more resilient, impactful, and trustworthy organisation.

Change doesn’t start with a restructure; it starts with one honest conversation.

Let's Chat

Note: These insights are general guidance based on practitioner experience and are not legal or regulatory advice. Make sure you review your specific funder contracts and data protection policies (e.g. GDPR) before making significant changes to data collection or retention schedules. Examples are for illustrative purposes only; no official affiliation with the organisations or tools mentioned is claimed.