The Hardest Conversation: Charity Service Closure
- Helen Vaterlaws

- Dec 18, 2025
- 6 min read
Updated: Jan 2
What if the hardest conversation in a charity is also the most strategic?

Deciding to close a service is a moment of profound responsibility. It can feel like a failure, sparking fears of letting down users, staff, and funders. However, avoiding the decision is a far greater risk.
Responsible closure is not an admission of defeat; it is an act of strategic courage. It’s how you honour the people you serve by ensuring every pound and every hour is focused on delivering the greatest possible impact. In our Service Lifecycle Management model, the ‘Retire’ phase is a planned and vital act of stewardship.
This guide provides a framework to turn a conversation you might be dreading into one of your most constructive. Use it to structure a team meeting, inform a board paper, or build confidence with funders that you are leading with clarity and care.
Phase 1: Preparation before the meeting
A good outcome depends on good preparation. Don't walk into this conversation cold.
1. Recognise the triggers: How to decide when to close a charity service?

Impact is slipping: Key outcomes or equity measures are in decline.
The context has shifted: User demand, local needs, or the strategic landscape has changed.
Sustainability is at risk: Funding is precarious or the full cost of delivery is unsustainable.
It’s part of a routine: You’re conducting a regular portfolio review to ensure all services remain aligned and effective (the ideal scenario!).
2. Decision criteria for ending a charity service
Decide how you will decide before the meeting to ensure a fair and objective process. Use or adapt these criteria, and consider weighting them based on your current strategy:

Strategic Fit: How well does this service align with our core mission and current 3-year strategy? Is it pulling us towards our goals or away from them?
Impact & Outcomes: What is the evidence that the service is effective? Is the trend of its key outcomes improving, stable, or declining?
Equity & Reach: Who are we reaching effectively? More importantly, who is being systemically missed or excluded by the current model?
Lived Experience: What are service users (past and present) telling us about its value and their experience?
Sustainability & True Cost: Can we afford to run this service well? What is its true cost, including management overhead, and is the funding model viable for the future?
Organisational Health: What is the impact of this service on our staff and volunteers? Does it create energy or cause burnout? What are the risks of continuing, changing, or closing it?
3. Prepare the evidence snapshot
Collate the essential data onto a single page. This isn't a deep-dive report; it's a catalyst for discussion.

Reach: Who are you serving, and in what numbers?
3 Key Outcome Measures: Are you making the difference you intended? Show the trend over time (e.g., last 3 years).
True Cost: What is the full cost to deliver, including management and overheads? Is it financially sustainable?
Equity Signals: Who is being missed or excluded by the current model? Use demographic data or feedback to highlight gaps.
Safeguarding Notes: Are there any current or potential safeguarding risks associated with the service?
Lived-Experience Feedback: A few powerful quotes or key themes from service users about what is (and isn’t) working.
4. Assemble the right people

This isn't a conversation for just the finance team or the service delivery team in isolation. Ensure the meeting includes the Service Owner, a senior leader with budget authority, someone representing the service user voice, and a trustee if appropriate. Diverse perspectives lead to better, more robust decisions.
Phase 2: A framework for the charity service closure conversation
Goal: To move from worry to a clear, evidence-based decision: should this service grow, pivot/redesign, remain steady, or retire?
Set the Scene (5 mins)
Name the service and briefly recap its original purpose and the people it serves.
State the meeting's purpose clearly: "Our goal today is to review the evidence, assess our strategic options, and agree on the best path forward. This is about making a responsible choice, not assigning blame."
Review the Evidence Snapshot (10 mins)
Walk through the one-page summary.
Allow for clarifying questions but avoid getting lost in the detail. The purpose is to establish a shared understanding of the current situation.
Evaluate the Options (10-15 mins)
Map the four options (Grow / Pivot / Steady / Retire) against the evidence.
Use your pre-agreed criteria to guide the discussion. Be honest about uncertainties and trade-offs for each option.
💡Facilitator's Tip: Use calming, constructive language: "Let’s map the options and the evidence we have for each." "What would have to be true for us to choose the 'Grow' option?" "If we decide to stop or change, how do we ensure the transition is safe, dignified, and fair for everyone involved?"
What if you can't decide?
If the group is stuck between two options (e.g., Pivot vs. Retire), don't force a conclusion. The decision is to commission a short, time-boxed piece of work to answer the key outstanding question.
For example: "We agree to pause the decision for two weeks while [Name] models the financial cost of the pivot option and gathers user feedback on the proposed change."
This maintains momentum and ensures the final decision is fully informed.
Make the Decision & Plan the Transition (10-25 mins)
Based on the evaluation, seek agreement on the path forward.
If the decision is to Retire or Pivot/Redesign: Immediately block out time to plan the transition. Focus on a safe and orderly process. Name a transition lead, identify key risks, determine where users will be signposted, and assign communications tasks.
If the decision is to Grow or Steady: Briefly outline the immediate next steps required to resource or maintain the service and set a future review date.
Agree Actions & Close (5 mins)
Summarise the decision and the immediate next steps.
Confirm named owners for each action, simple success measures, and a clear timeline.
Phase 3: After the decision (Immediate priorities)
If you decide to retire or significantly change a service, your duty of care is paramount.
Your Immediate Action Plan Must Include:
A Named Transition Lead: With a designated deputy. This transition lead may have many of the skills outlined in our Service Owner profile.
A Clear Transition Plan: Documenting who does what, by when, and where people will be redirected. This must be user-centered.
Safeguarding & Risk Mitigation: Document all potential risks (especially to vulnerable users) and the specific actions you will take to mitigate them.
Review & Learn: Set a date in 6-12 months to review the impact of the closure and capture the learnings for future service design and portfolio management.
A Communications Plan: A clear plan for informing staff, volunteers, service users, funders, and partners. Define the message, the messenger, and the timeline. Start with your internal team first.
Team & Wellbeing Support: A plan to support the staff and volunteers directly impacted by the change. This includes one-to-one meetings, clarity on their future roles, and signposting to wellbeing resources. A compassionate process protects your people and your organisational culture.
Resource Re-allocation: A clear, transparent plan for what happens to the staff/volunteer time, budget, and other assets freed up by the change.
Share the minutes and this clear action plan within 48 hours. Swift, clear communication maintains trust and momentum.
Make it real
An honest conversation is the first step. To help you have it, we’ve turned this framework into a one-page PDF canvas you can use to structure your meeting.
Go deeper
Service closure doesn't happen in a vacuum. It's a key part of a healthy service lifecycle. See the bigger picture with our guide to Strategic 'Retire & Renew': A Charity Service Portfolio Review.
Equip your team to manage the whole process with our full Service Lifecycle Management for Charities Guide.
By treating the end of a service with the same strategic rigour as its beginning, you build a more resilient, impactful, and trustworthy organisation.
Change doesn’t start with a restructure; it starts with one honest conversation.
If you need a hand facilitating it, let's talk.
Note: Examples are for illustrative purposes only; no official affiliation with the organisations or tools mentioned is claimed. AI systems can be unpredictable, so always keep personal or sensitive data out of third-party tools and ensure your implementation follows your own organisation’s data protection policies.


