How I help charities

AI tools are moving faster than governance frameworks can keep up. Even if your charity is not formally using AI, staff, volunteers, or service users may already be encountering it. A responsible framework helps you decide what to adopt, what to pause, and what to avoid.

Silent Drift is the name I've given to a governance gap most charities have not yet considered. AI tools can gradually change their behaviour over time, or behave differently in everyday use than they did during evaluation, often without warning. That means the tool your board approved may no longer be the tool your team is using. My Silent Drift Audit gives charities a practical way to check.

AI safety focuses on practical risks such as data security, safeguarding vulnerable people, and preventing harm from poorly implemented tools. AI ethics is the broader framework of values and principles guiding how AI should be developed and used. For charities, both matter.

You can expect a clear picture of where AI is being used, stronger and more proportionate governance, and decisions your board can stand behind. You'll be better placed to adopt AI responsibly, catch problems early, and show trustees and funders that it's being handled with care.

I help charities with operational challenges, AI governance, and AI safety. That can include improving how teams work, preparing for responsible AI use, and putting practical governance in place that fits the way charities actually operate.

Every engagement is shaped by the goals, scope, and impact needs of the project. I work with charities of all sizes, from small independents to national bodies, and I am committed to making this work accessible across the sector. The right starting point is a conversation: once I understand what you are trying to achieve, I can give you a clear picture of what is involved and what it is likely to cost.

A first conversation is a practical chat about your goals, what may be getting in the way, and whether I can help.