A 60-Minute Service Lifecycle Check-In for Charities
- Helen Vaterlaws

- Nov 28, 2025
- 5 min read
Updated: Jan 2
One service, one honest conversation
Charity teams are under pressure to do more, faster – often across multiple services at once. You don’t always have the time or headspace for a full redesign. But you can make space for one honest conversation.
This practical 60-minute service lifecycle check-in for charities is built to fit inside busy diaries. You can run with your team, using the four-stage service lifecycle – Discover & Define, Design & Test, Deliver & Improve, Retire & Renew.

Use it to:
✅ spot where a service is quietly wobbling
✅ agree 1–3 practical next steps
✅ make better use of your service owners and their one-page profiles.
What is a service lifecycle check-in?
A service lifecycle check-in is a short, structured conversation where you look at one service across all four stages of its lifecycle:
Discover & Define – the need and purpose
Design & Test – what you’re trying or changing
Deliver & Improve – how it works day to day
Retire & Renew – whether it’s still the best use of energy
Instead of diving straight into solutions, you walk through each stage, capture what’s really happening, and come out with a clear tilt: grow, steady, pivot or retire.
When charities should use a 60-minute service lifecycle check-in
This works best when:
A service feels fragile – lots of firefighting, unclear decisions, exhausted staff or volunteers.
You’ve just named a service owner and want to back them with a clear rhythm.
You’re heading into planning season and need a quick reality check before you promise new pilots.
A board paper or funder report has raised questions and you want to look at the service as a whole, not just one KPI.
Step 0: Set the Scene (5 minutes)
Goal: Make it clear what this hour is and isn’t.

Name the service you’re focusing on.
Recap its purpose in one or two sentences: who it’s for, what it’s there to do.
If you have a service owner profile, share it on one page so everyone can see who holds end-to-end responsibility.
You might say:
“We’re not trying to fix everything today. We’re taking one hour to look at this service across the whole lifecycle and agree 1–3 next steps.”
Then move quickly into the four stages of service lifecycle.
Step 1 – Discover & Define: what’s changed in the world? (15 minutes)
This stage is about need and context, not solutions.
Questions to ask:
What do people who use this service – and volunteers – say they need and value right now?
How has demand changed in the last 6–12 months? Who’s showing up more, less or not at all?
What’s shifted around us – cost-of-living pressures, policy changes, new local partners or gaps?
If we had to write a one-sentence problem statement today, would it be the same as last year?

Outputs (on a sticky note or shared doc):
1–2 bullet points on “what’s changed”
1 short problem statement you broadly agree on.
This gives you a grounded starting point for the rest of the hour.
Step 2 – Design & Test: what are we actually trying or changing? (15 minutes)
Here you look at how you’re adapting the service, not just delivering it.
Questions to ask:
What tweaks or pilots have we tried in the last year? What did we learn?
Where are staff or volunteers quietly running workarounds that might be better as formal tests?
If we had capacity for one small experiment in the next 60–90 days, what would we choose?
What would success look like – and how would we know?
Keep it light. You’re not rewriting the whole model; you’re surfacing one or two structured tests instead of endless informal fixes.
Outputs:
A shortlist of 1–2 small experiments to explore further
A rough sense of how you’ll judge if they’re worth scaling or stopping.
Step 3 – Deliver & Improve: how is it working day to day? (20 minutes)
This is the core of the check-in. You move from ideas to the real lived experience of staff, volunteers and people using the service.

Questions to ask:
Where does the service wobble in real life – long waits, confusing hand-offs, repeated complaints?
What does our data say? Look at a simple mix: reach, equity, outcomes, complaints themes, key risks.
Where are we relying on heroic effort – last-minute fixes, overtime, invisible emotional labour?
What feels fragile – “this only works because X is hanging on for dear life”?
What are staff and volunteers telling us that we haven’t yet acted on?
You’re not trying to solve every issue in the room. The job is to name the patterns and pick a few priorities.
Output: A short “improvement backlog” for this service – 3–5 issues or ideas, ranked by impact and risk.
Step 4 – Retire & Renew: is this still the best use of energy? (10 minutes)
The last stage asks the hard but necessary question: should this service stay as it is, change, or make space for something better?
Questions to ask:
Given everything we’ve just surfaced, is this service:
Grow – doing well, worth investing more in?
Steady – mostly working, needs targeted fixes?
Pivot – still needed, but needs a shift in focus or model?
Retire / merge – no longer the best way to meet this need?
If we decided to end or merge it in 12–18 months, what would we have to plan now to do that safely and fairly?
What do we need – evidence, conversations, board time – to make a clear decision?
This isn’t about forcing closure. It’s about normalising Retire & Renew as part of good governance, not a quiet last resort.
Outputs:
A simple “tilt” decision: Grow, Steady, Pivot or Retire/Merge
One action that moves you towards that, even if it’s just “book a portfolio conversation with the exec sponsor and service owner.”
Bringing it together: your 60-minute agenda
Here’s how it looks as a one-hour plan:

1) Set the frame – 5 mins
Name the service, purpose and owner.
2) Discover & Define – 15 mins
What’s changed in need and context?
3) Design & Test – 15 mins
What are we trying, or what should we test next?
4) Deliver & Improve – 20 mins
Where does it wobble day to day? What’s in the improvement backlog?
5) Retire & Renew – 10 mins
Grow, steady, pivot or retire? What’s the one next step?
During your service lifecycle check-in you can capture the notes on a single page and bring them back to your next service owner review, board sub-committee or planning round.
What next?
If this resonated and a particular service is already flashing in your mind:
Start with one service and one hour – don’t try to fix the whole portfolio.
If you want a template for a 60-minute service lifecycle check-in for charities, download our one-page service owner profile.
Pair this mini-guide with the full Service lifecycle management for charities article for deeper examples and prompts.
Change doesn’t start with a workshop; it starts with one honest conversation – and this hour might be a good place to begin.
Note: Examples are for illustrative purposes only; no official affiliation with the organisations or tools mentioned is claimed. AI systems can be unpredictable, so always keep personal or sensitive data out of third-party tools and ensure your implementation follows your own organisation’s data protection policies.


